Virtual private servers
9 of 28 virtual private servers listings publish a rate we can read. On H100-SXM-80GB, the one most of them price, rates run from $2.25/GPU·hr to $4.65/GPU·hr across 3 providers — a spread of 2.1×, median $4.31/GPU·hr. Each rate is read from the provider's own pricing page.
A machine you administer yourself, billed hourly or monthly. The oldest and still the most common way to host something.
NARROW BY WHAT THIS CATEGORY ASKS
MINIMUM COMMITMENT · 19 NOT READ
SOC 2 · 23 NOT READ
DDOS PROTECTION · 24 NOT READ
CHEAPEST · H100-SXM-80GB
$2.25/GPU·hr
MEDIAN
$4.31/GPU·hr
SPREAD
2.1×
PROVIDERS
3 of 28
Above: one card, H100-SXM-80GB, across the 3 providers selling it — the only like-for-like comparison here. Below: each provider’s own cheapest rate, on whatever card that is. They are different questions and the second one is not a ranking.
NO RATE ON RECORD · 19
We have not read a published rate for these. A dash in a price column reads as cheap; this reads as what it is. Some publish nothing, some quote on request, and some we have simply not reached.
AceCloudAtlas CloudCleuraCloudwaysCloudzyContaboDatabase MartExoscaleFlightcontrolFly.ioGreen AI CloudHetznerHostikoHostingerLeasewebOracle CloudThalassa CloudUpCloudZenlayer
ONE RATE PER PROVIDER — ITS CHEAPEST, WITH THE SKU IT IS FOR · A MEDIAN NEEDS EVERY OTHER SELLER’S PRICES, WHICH IS WHY NO VENDOR PUBLISHES ONE · EVERY RATE CARRIES THE PAGE IT WAS READ FROM AND THE DATE
SORTED BY ONE STATED COLUMN · USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY — NOT A POPULARITY FIGURE · NO OVERALL SCORE AND NO RANK COLUMN, BECAUSE BLENDING ADOPTION, STARS AND DOWNLOADS NEEDS WEIGHTS, AND WEIGHTS ARE AN OPINION PRESENTED AS ARITHMETIC
Cite this page
The count and its date sit inside the citation, because “Virtual private servers” without a date is a claim that quietly goes wrong as the category fills.
infratoapp, “Virtual private servers — Compute / Cloud”, read 27 October 2026. 28 listed products. https://www.infratoapp.com/layers/compute/vps
No overall score, and no rank column
Blending adoption, stars and downloads needs weights, and weights are an opinion presented as arithmetic — so this table sorts by one stated column at a time and shows which. This view holds no billing column and joins no billing table: a sponsor cannot appear higher, and the signals meter is a row’s own confidence, never a score you can sort on.







