Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 vs deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 vs deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 is cheaper: $60.00 a month at DeepSeek, against $231.00 for deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 at DeepSeek — 3.9× the cost.

Cheapest on each

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
5 SELLERSView deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 →
$231.00/mo
cheapest, at DeepSeek — $0.66 in, $1.98 out per million
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
5 SELLERSView deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 →
$60.00/mo
cheapest, at DeepSeek — $0.15 in, $0.6 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributedeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
Context window1M1M
AcceptsAaAa · IMG
Sellers55
Cheapest input rate$0.66 / M$0.15 / M
Cached input rate$0.022 / M$0.003 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.