Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Compute / Cloud / Cloud platform / Exoscale

By Exoscale

CLOUD PLATFORMEDGE AND CDNGPU CLOUDSMANAGED DATABASESMANAGED KUBERNETESOBJECT STORAGEVIRTUAL PRIVATE SERVERS

Exoscale — European cloud provider Exoscale for modern infrastructure. Listed under Cloud platform in the Compute / Cloud layer. 7 of 39 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

Exoscale is a European cloud provider for compute, storage, networking, Kubernetes, databases and AI workloads. GDPR-compliant, with zero lock-in.

2 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD · MISSING LICENCE, REPOSITORY

WebsitePricing page

What it runs on, and what runs on it

0 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

No edges on record for Exoscale.

Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.

Submit a documented integration →

From Exoscale? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what Exoscale runs on is enough.

Open-source signals

LICENCE
not measured
STARS
not measured
DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
not measured

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

The seller publishes a pricing page, linked above, but we read no rate from it. Either it quotes by sales call rather than in public, or the last reading passed 21 days and was hidden rather than shown stale. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

7 answered · 32 unanswered

39 questions declared by Cloud platform and Edge and CDN and GPU clouds and Managed databases and Managed Kubernetes and Object storage and Virtual private servers. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Data residency8 European zones
“Object Storage S3-compatible storage across 8 European zones”
2026-10-06
Edge locationsunder 252026-09-23
GPU modelsNVIDIA
“1 to 8 NVIDIA cards per instance”
2026-10-06
KubernetesYes
“Managed Kubernetes — clusters ready in minutes.”
2026-09-15
Per-second billingYes2026-09-23
Regions8 regions
“Object Storage S3-compatible storage across 8 European zones”
2026-10-06
SOC 2Yes
“Certified infrastructure (ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, SOC 2, BSI C5, CSA STAR)”
2026-09-22
Autoscalingno answer on record
Bandwidth includedno answer on record
Bare metalno answer on record
CNCF conformantno answer on record
Connection poolingno answer on record
DDoS protectionno answer on record
Durabilityno answer on record
Edge computeno answer on record
Enginesno answer on record
Free control planeno answer on record
Free egressno answer on record
Free tierno answer on record
GDPR DPAno answer on record
GPU node poolsno answer on record
High availabilityno answer on record
HTTP/3no answer on record
Image optimisationno answer on record
Interconnectno answer on record
IPv6no answer on record
Managed TLSno answer on record
Managed upgradesno answer on record
Minimum commitmentno answer on record
Object versioningno answer on record
OS imagesno answer on record
Point-in-time recoveryno answer on record
Read replicasno answer on record
S3-compatible APIno answer on record
Scale to zerono answer on record
Snapshots or backupsno answer on record
Spot / preemptibleno answer on record
Storage classesno answer on record
WAF includedno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

96 products in Cloud platform. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

3NVNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
AceCloudNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
AIEEVNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
Akamai Cloud (Linode)NO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
Alibaba CloudNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
Atlas CloudNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
BackblazeNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
BentausNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

Does Exoscale offer kubernetes?
Yes. Read from their own page: “Managed Kubernetes — clusters ready in minutes.”.
Does Exoscale offer SOC 2?
Yes. Read from their own page: “Certified infrastructure (ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, SOC 2, BSI C5, CSA STAR)”.
What does a blank mean on the Exoscale page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the Exoscale figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can Exoscale change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.
Is this listing run by Exoscale?
No. It is built from public sources, and no value on it came from the company. Anyone with an address at exoscale.com can claim it for free. A claim lets the company write the tagline, description and logo, and answer blank questions or add dependencies, each marked as theirs with a source. Prices, licence and OSS figures stay as the directory read them, category changes only through our review, and each can be disputed with a source.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “Exoscale — Cloud platform”, read 6 October 2026. Data residency: 8 European zones as published at exoscale.com. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/exoscale

What Exoscale can and cannot change here

Claiming Exoscale lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.

Claim ExoscaleFree · email at exoscale.com