Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / moonshotai/kimi-k3 vs z-ai/glm-5.2

moonshotai/kimi-k3 vs z-ai/glm-5.2

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, z-ai/glm-5.2 is cheaper: $356.82 a month at OpenRouter, against $612.80 for moonshotai/kimi-k3 at OpenRouter — 1.7× the cost.

Cheapest on each

moonshotai/kimi-k3
6 SELLERSView moonshotai/kimi-k3 →
$612.80/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.189 in, $11.5 out per million
z-ai/glm-5.2
6 SELLERSView z-ai/glm-5.2 →
$356.82/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.0341 in, $7 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributemoonshotai/kimi-k3z-ai/glm-5.2
Context window1M1M
AcceptsAa · IMG · VIDAa
Sellers66
Cheapest input rate$0.189 / M$0.0341 / M
Cached input rate$0.179 / M$0.033 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.