Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Compute / Cloud / Managed Kubernetes

Managed Kubernetes

COMPARE TWO OF THESE →

5 of 17 managed kubernetes listings publish a rate we can read. On L40S-48GB, the one most of them price, rates run from $1.29/GPU·hr to $1.67/GPU·hr across 2 providers — a spread of 1.3×, median $1.48/GPU·hr. Each rate is read from the provider's own pricing page.

A Kubernetes control plane someone else operates, with nodes you size.

17 in this category
5 PRICED · SORT AND VIEW BELOW

NARROW BY WHAT THIS CATEGORY ASKS

DATA RESIDENCY · 10 NOT READ

SOC 2 · 14 NOT READ

AUTOSCALING · 15 NOT READ

CHEAPEST · L40S-48GB

$1.29/GPU·hr

MEDIAN

$1.48/GPU·hr

SPREAD

1.3×

PROVIDERS

2 of 17

Above: one card, L40S-48GB, across the 2 providers selling it — the only like-for-like comparison here. Below: each provider’s own cheapest rate, on whatever card that is. They are different questions and the second one is not a ranking.

NO RATE ON RECORD · 12

We have not read a published rate for these. A dash in a price column reads as cheap; this reads as what it is. Some publish nothing, some quote on request, and some we have simply not reached.

AceCloudAlibaba CloudCleuraDatabase MartExoscaleFly.ioGreen AI CloudKubernsLeasewebOracle CloudThalassa CloudUpCloud

ONE RATE PER PROVIDER — ITS CHEAPEST, WITH THE SKU IT IS FOR · A MEDIAN NEEDS EVERY OTHER SELLER’S PRICES, WHICH IS WHY NO VENDOR PUBLISHES ONE · EVERY RATE CARRIES THE PAGE IT WAS READ FROM AND THE DATE

SORTED BY ONE STATED COLUMN · USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY — NOT A POPULARITY FIGURE · NO OVERALL SCORE AND NO RANK COLUMN, BECAUSE BLENDING ADOPTION, STARS AND DOWNLOADS NEEDS WEIGHTS, AND WEIGHTS ARE AN OPINION PRESENTED AS ARITHMETIC

Cite this page

The count and its date sit inside the citation, because “Managed Kubernetes” without a date is a claim that quietly goes wrong as the category fills.

infratoapp, “Managed Kubernetes — Compute / Cloud”, read 27 October 2026. 17 listed products. https://www.infratoapp.com/layers/compute/managed-kubernetes

No overall score, and no rank column

Blending adoption, stars and downloads needs weights, and weights are an opinion presented as arithmetic — so this table sorts by one stated column at a time and shows which. This view holds no billing column and joins no billing table: a sponsor cannot appear higher, and the signals meter is a row’s own confidence, never a score you can sort on.

Frequently asked

What is in the Managed Kubernetes category?
17 products in the Compute / Cloud layer of the AI stack. A Kubernetes control plane someone else operates, with nodes you size. Listed members include AceCloud, Akamai Cloud (Linode) and Alibaba Cloud. Every fact on each listing carries the page it was read from and the date it was read.
How are Managed Kubernetes compared here?
By the 11 attributes this category declares, asked of every member and answered only where a source states it. A product with no answer on record shows a gap rather than a guess, and no blended score is published — weights would be an opinion presented as arithmetic.
AceCloud or Akamai Cloud (Linode)?
Both are listed under Managed Kubernetes. We publish no verdict between them — we hold no benchmark that would support one. What we do hold is the same attribute sheet for each, side by side with the source behind every value, at /compare/acecloud-vs-akamai-cloud.
What does a blank mean on a managed kubernetes row?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A listing with a blank has not failed the question; it has not been read for it.
How often are managed kubernetes figures re-read?
Every value carries the date it was read and a link to the page it came from. Prices move fastest and are re-read most often; an attribute read weeks ago says so rather than presenting itself as current. Anything past 21 days is hidden rather than shown stale.
Is this every managed kubernete there is?
No. This is 17 we have read and can cite. A directory that claimed completeness would be making a promise it cannot keep, so the page states its own count instead and says when a category is too thin to shortlist from.
Can a vendor pay to rank higher here?
No. Nothing on this page can be bought: a sponsor cannot enter a table, reorder a row or change a mark, and there is no ranked position for sale. How the site is paid for, and the line each source of money does not cross, is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.