H200-NVL-141GB vs H200-SXM-141GB
H200-SXM-141GB is the cheaper of the two: $2.09/hr at Beam, against $3.62/hr for H200-NVL-141GB at Massed Compute — 1.7× the price.
Cheapest on each
Aligned facts
Same sheet, same order, both cards — including the gaps.
| Attribute | H200-NVL-141GB | H200-SXM-141GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 141 GB | 141 GB |
| Bandwidth | 4.8 TB/s | 4.8 TB/s |
| FP16 | 835 TFLOPS | 989 TFLOPS▲ |
| FP8 | 1670 TFLOPS | 1979 TFLOPS▲ |
| TDP | 600 W | 700 W▲ |
| NVLink | 2- or 4-way NVIDIA NVLink bridge: 900GB/s per GPU PCIe Gen5: 128GB/s | NVLink 4▲ |
| Architecture | Hopper | Hopper |
| Released | 2024 | 2024 |
A blank is not a zero. Where one card states a figure and the other states none, neither wins the row — the second number is unknown, and ranking an unknown as nothing is how a comparison starts to lie.
Every seller, both cards
One row per seller, cheapest tier, on-demand list prices only. Sellers of both cards lead, cheapest combined rate first.
| Seller | H200-NVL-141GB | H200-SXM-141GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lium | $3.752026-10-27JSON | $3.902026-10-27JSON |
| Vast.ai | $4.002026-10-27 | $4.602026-10-27 |
| RunPod | $3.792026-10-27 | $5.292026-10-27 |
| Massed Compute | $3.622026-10-26 | ○ no answer |
| Beam | ○ no answer | $2.092026-10-27 |
| Shadeform | ○ no answer | $2.252026-10-26 |
| Theta EdgeCloud | ○ no answer | $2.292026-10-26 |
| Sesterce | ○ no answer | $2.482026-10-07 |
| Koyeb | ○ no answer | $3.002026-10-26 |
| Civo | ○ no answer | $3.492026-10-27 |
| DeepInfra | ○ no answer | $3.492026-10-26 |
| Hyperbolic | ○ no answer | $3.992026-10-26 |
| Oblivus | ○ no answer | $3.992026-10-26 |
| Hyperstack | ○ no answer | $3.992026-10-26 |
| Canopy Wave | ○ no answer | $4.002026-10-27 |
| Cerebrium | ○ no answer | $4.202026-10-27 |
| DigitalOcean | ○ no answer | $4.472026-10-11 |
| Modal | ○ no answer | $4.542026-10-26 |
| Runcrate | ○ no answer | $4.632026-10-26 |
| Spheron | ○ no answer | $4.802026-10-26 |
| Replicate | ○ no answer | $5.492026-10-26 |
| Enverge | ○ no answer | $5.502026-10-26 |
| Crusoe | ○ no answer | $6.002026-10-27 |
| Fal.ai | ○ no answer | $6.002026-10-26 |
| Verda (DataCrunch) | ○ no answer | $6.072026-10-27 |
| Lyceum | ○ no answer | $6.192026-10-26 |
| CoreWeave | ○ no answer | $6.302026-10-26 |
What this page will not tell you
On-demand list rates only · spot and committed terms priced separately and not mixed in here · no performance-per-dollar figure appears on this page, because it needs a throughput benchmark we do not hold and dividing a price by a vendor’s own TFLOPS claim produces a number that looks authoritative and means nothing