B200-SXM-192GB vs RTX-PRO-6000-96GB
RTX-PRO-6000-96GB is the cheaper of the two: $0.8/hr at HyperAI, against $3.74/hr for B200-SXM-192GB at Shadeform — 4.7× the price.
Cheapest on each
Aligned facts
Same sheet, same order, both cards — including the gaps.
| Attribute | B200-SXM-192GB | RTX-PRO-6000-96GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 192 GB▲ | 96 GB |
| Bandwidth | 8 TB/s▲ | 1.79 TB/s |
| FP16 | 2250 TFLOPS | ○ no answer |
| FP8 | 4500 TFLOPS | ○ no answer |
| TDP | 1000 W▲ | 600 W |
| NVLink | NVLink 5 | PCIe 5 (no NVLink) |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Blackwell |
| Released | 2024 | 2025▲ |
A blank is not a zero. Where one card states a figure and the other states none, neither wins the row — the second number is unknown, and ranking an unknown as nothing is how a comparison starts to lie.
Every seller, both cards
One row per seller, cheapest tier, on-demand list prices only. Sellers of both cards lead, cheapest combined rate first.
What this page will not tell you
On-demand list rates only · spot and committed terms priced separately and not mixed in here · no performance-per-dollar figure appears on this page, because it needs a throughput benchmark we do not hold and dividing a price by a vendor’s own TFLOPS claim produces a number that looks authoritative and means nothing