Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / A100-80GB vs A100-SXM-80GB

A100-80GB vs A100-SXM-80GB

A100-SXM-80GB is the cheaper of the two: $1.07/hr at Vast.ai, against $1.43/hr for A100-80GB at Packet·ai — 1.3× the price.

Cheapest on each

A100-80GB
7 SELLERSView A100-80GB →
$1.43/hr
cheapest, at Packet·ai
A100-SXM-80GB
9 SELLERSView A100-SXM-80GB →
$1.07/hr
cheapest, at Vast.ai

Aligned facts

Same sheet, same order, both cards — including the gaps.

AttributeA100-80GBA100-SXM-80GB
VRAM○ no answer80 GB
Bandwidth○ no answer2.039 TB/s
FP16○ no answer312 TFLOPS
FP8○ no answer○ no answer
TDP○ no answer400 W
NVLink○ no answerNVLink 3
Architecture○ no answerAmpere
Released○ no answer2020

A blank is not a zero. Where one card states a figure and the other states none, neither wins the row — the second number is unknown, and ranking an unknown as nothing is how a comparison starts to lie.

Every seller, both cards

One row per seller, cheapest tier, on-demand list prices only. Sellers of both cards lead, cheapest combined rate first.

SellerA100-80GBA100-SXM-80GB
Packet·ai○ no answer
DeepInfra○ no answer
Oblivus○ no answer
Runcrate○ no answer
Thunder Compute○ no answer
Theta EdgeCloud○ no answer
Leafcloud○ no answer
Vast.ai○ no answer
Beam○ no answer
Massed Compute○ no answer
Hyperstack○ no answer
RunPod○ no answer
TensorDock○ no answer
Koyeb○ no answer
Verda (DataCrunch)○ no answer
Lambda○ no answer

What this page will not tell you

On-demand list rates only · spot and committed terms priced separately and not mixed in here · no performance-per-dollar figure appears on this page, because it needs a throughput benchmark we do not hold and dividing a price by a vendor’s own TFLOPS claim produces a number that looks authoritative and means nothing