This page holds no documented attribute, no price and no cited stack edges; anything the vendor added is marked and does not count. So it is excluded from search engines until it holds something. Thin pages get penalised at scale, and a page that says nothing should not be indexed as though it did.
A link to a public page that states what it is, costs or runs on is what fills it. Send one.
dsh-anchored-standard
UNCLAIMEDBy xiaobright
dsh-anchored-standard — Two-phase DeepSeek Harness preset: Minimal-aligned bootstrap, then full Standard tools (Project2 98/99). Listed under Tool use and MCP in the Orchestration / Agents layer. None of the 6 comparison attributes for its category are recorded yet.
Personal LLM engineering-maintenance evaluation harness (V4.1b, frozen). Not a public benchmark. - xiaobright/modeltest
2 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD · MISSING LOGO, LICENCE
What it runs on, and what runs on it
0 cited edgesComputed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.
No edges on record for dsh-anchored-standard.
Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.
Submit a documented integration →From xiaobright? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what dsh-anchored-standard runs on is enough.
Open-source signals
A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE
Price
We hold no price for this product.
This is open-source software: you can run it yourself and the licence costs nothing. If the project also sells a hosted service, we do not yet hold the page it prices it on. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.
How we read prices →What its categories ask
0 answered · 6 unanswered6 questions declared by Tool use and MCP. Most rows across the directory read like these.
A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE
Practitioner reviews
Nobody has written one yet.
A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.
NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER
Also in this category
62 products in Tool use and MCP. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.
USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY
Frequently asked
Is dsh-anchored-standard open source?
What does a blank mean on the dsh-anchored-standard page?
Where do the dsh-anchored-standard figures come from?
Can dsh-anchored-standard change what this page says?
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Is this listing run by xiaobright?
Cite this page
A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.
infratoapp, “dsh-anchored-standard — Tool use and MCP”. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/dsh-anchored-standard
What dsh-anchored-standard can and cannot change here
Claiming xiaobright lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.
xiaobright’s website is on shared hosting, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. If you maintain it, send a correction with a source.
Maintain xiaobright? Ask us to verify you.