Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Orchestration / Agents / Tool use and MCP / Semantic Kernel

Semantic Kernel

UNCLAIMED

By microsoft

TOOL USE AND MCP

Semantic Kernel — Semantic Kernel Python SDK. Listed under Tool use and MCP in the Orchestration / Agents layer. 4 of 6 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

Learn about Semantic Kernel

4 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD

WebsiteDocsPricing pagemicrosoft/semantic-kernel

What it runs on, and what runs on it

14 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

RUNS ON / INTEGRATES WITH

USED BY

Open-source signals

DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
2026-09-09
2026-09-10JSON

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

The seller publishes a pricing page, linked above, but we read no rate from it. Either it quotes by sales call rather than in public, or the last reading passed 21 days and was hidden rather than shown stale. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

4 answered · 2 unanswered

6 questions declared by Tool use and MCP. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
LicenceMIT2026-09-11JSON
Open sourceYes2026-09-11JSON
SDK languagesPython2026-09-11
Tool callingYes2026-09-23
MCP serverno answer on record
Public APIno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

More from microsoft

6 other products from microsoft. Listed under the same organisation record — see the company page.

AutoGenAutoGen agents and teams libraryOrchestration / AgentsAzure Machine LearningAzure Machine Learning core packages, modules, and classesMLOps / LifecycleMicrosoft AzureMicrosoft’s cloud, and the one OpenAI models are served fromCompute / CloudMicrosoft Copilot StudioBuild AI agents across Microsoft 365Orchestration / AgentsMicrosoft FoundryMicrosoft's managed platform for building and serving models on Azure, including the OpenAI modelsInference / ServingMicrosoft PhiPhi, Microsoft's small language modelsModel / Foundation

Also in this category

62 products in Tool use and MCP. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

TemporalUSED BY 6COMPARE →
MastraUSED BY 1COMPARE →
activepiecesNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
AgentChatNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agenvoyNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
ai-agents-from-zeroNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
ai-job-searchNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
aihawkNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

Is Semantic Kernel open source?
Yes — it is listed as open source, and its repository is the source for the activity figures on this page rather than anything the project says about itself.
What does Semantic Kernel run on?
Anthropic, AutoGen, Chroma and 10 more. Every one of those is an edge we recorded from documentation that states it, not an inference from what the two products have in common.
What does a blank mean on the Semantic Kernel page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the Semantic Kernel figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can Semantic Kernel change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.
Is this listing run by microsoft?
No. It is built from public sources, and no value on it came from the company. Its website is on shared hosting, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. A correction with a source can be sent instead. A claim lets the company write the tagline, description and logo, and answer blank questions or add dependencies, each marked as theirs with a source. Prices, licence and OSS figures stay as the directory read them, category changes only through our review, and each can be disputed with a source.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “Semantic Kernel — Tool use and MCP”, read 11 September 2026. Licence: MIT as published at api.github.com. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/semantic-kernel

What Semantic Kernel can and cannot change here

Claiming microsoft lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.

microsoft’s website is not recorded, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. If you maintain it, send a correction with a source.

Maintain microsoft? Ask us to verify you.