Model security and supply chain
The model and its supply chain as the asset under attack: weight scanning, serialisation exploits, provenance and signing, poisoned dependencies. Attacking the deployed system through its prompt is red teaming.
This category is below the depth bar — it holds 3 listings where we would want 12 before trusting a shortlist, so it is excluded from search engines and says so here rather than quietly.
NARROW BY WHAT THIS CATEGORY ASKS
No filter yet. A question becomes a filter once two listings answer it differently — this category has not been read that far.
agent-threat-rulesOpen detection-rule standard for AI agent security threats — like Sigma, but for AI agents. Executable rules across 10 categories; merged into Microsoft AGT, Cisco AI Defense, MISP, OWASP, FINOS & Sig389FF5 AI Guardrailsno tagline on record
HiddenLayerTotal AI SecuritySORTED BY ONE STATED COLUMN · USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY — NOT A POPULARITY FIGURE · NO OVERALL SCORE AND NO RANK COLUMN, BECAUSE BLENDING ADOPTION, STARS AND DOWNLOADS NEEDS WEIGHTS, AND WEIGHTS ARE AN OPINION PRESENTED AS ARITHMETIC
Cite this page
The count and its date sit inside the citation, because “Model security and supply chain” without a date is a claim that quietly goes wrong as the category fills.
infratoapp, “Model security and supply chain — Security / Governance”, read 27 October 2026. 3 listed products. https://www.infratoapp.com/layers/security/model-security
No overall score, and no rank column
Blending adoption, stars and downloads needs weights, and weights are an opinion presented as arithmetic — so this table sorts by one stated column at a time and shows which. This view holds no billing column and joins no billing table: a sponsor cannot appear higher, and the signals meter is a row’s own confidence, never a score you can sort on.