Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / RTX-3090-24GB vs RTX-PRO-6000-96GB

RTX-3090-24GB vs RTX-PRO-6000-96GB

RTX-3090-24GB is the cheaper of the two: $0.09/hr at Salad, against $0.8/hr for RTX-PRO-6000-96GB at HyperAI — 8.9× the price.

Cheapest on each

RTX-3090-24GB
5 SELLERSView RTX-3090-24GB →
$0.09/hr
cheapest, at Salad
RTX-PRO-6000-96GB
19 SELLERSView RTX-PRO-6000-96GB →
$0.80/hr
cheapest, at HyperAI

Aligned facts

Same sheet, same order, both cards — including the gaps.

AttributeRTX-3090-24GBRTX-PRO-6000-96GB
VRAM24 GB96 GB▲
Bandwidth○ no answer1.79 TB/s
FP16○ no answer○ no answer
FP8○ no answer○ no answer
TDP○ no answer600 W
NVLink○ no answerPCIe 5 (no NVLink)
ArchitectureAmpereBlackwell
Released○ no answer2025

A blank is not a zero. Where one card states a figure and the other states none, neither wins the row — the second number is unknown, and ranking an unknown as nothing is how a comparison starts to lie.

Every seller, both cards

One row per seller, cheapest tier, on-demand list prices only. Sellers of both cards lead, cheapest combined rate first.

SellerRTX-3090-24GBRTX-PRO-6000-96GB
Lium
RunPod
Salad○ no answer
Theta EdgeCloud○ no answer
TensorDock○ no answer
HyperAI○ no answer
Shadeform○ no answer
Beam○ no answer
GPUhub○ no answer
Vast.ai○ no answer
Nova Cloud○ no answer
Hyperstack○ no answer
EcoHash○ no answer
Enverge○ no answer
Massed Compute○ no answer
Spheron○ no answer
Cerebrium○ no answer
3NV○ no answer
Verda (DataCrunch)○ no answer
Runcrate○ no answer
Modal○ no answer
Fal.ai○ no answer

What this page will not tell you

On-demand list rates only · spot and committed terms priced separately and not mixed in here · no performance-per-dollar figure appears on this page, because it needs a throughput benchmark we do not hold and dividing a price by a vendor’s own TFLOPS claim produces a number that looks authoritative and means nothing