Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / H100-SXM-80GB vs RTX-5090-32GB

H100-SXM-80GB vs RTX-5090-32GB

RTX-5090-32GB is the cheaper of the two: $0.25/hr at Salad, against $2.25/hr for H100-SXM-80GB at TensorDock — 9.0× the price.

Cheapest on each

H100-SXM-80GB
13 SELLERSView H100-SXM-80GB →
$2.25/hr
cheapest, at TensorDock
RTX-5090-32GB
10 SELLERSView RTX-5090-32GB →
$0.25/hr
cheapest, at Salad

Aligned facts

Same sheet, same order, both cards — including the gaps.

AttributeH100-SXM-80GBRTX-5090-32GB
VRAM80 GB▲32 GB
Bandwidth3.35 TB/s▲1.79 TB/s
FP16989 TFLOPS○ no answer
FP81979 TFLOPS○ no answer
TDP700 W▲575 W
NVLinkNVLink 4PCIe 5 (no NVLink)▲
ArchitectureHopperBlackwell (GB202)
Released20222025▲

A blank is not a zero. Where one card states a figure and the other states none, neither wins the row — the second number is unknown, and ranking an unknown as nothing is how a comparison starts to lie.

Every seller, both cards

One row per seller, cheapest tier, on-demand list prices only. Sellers of both cards lead, cheapest combined rate first.

SellerH100-SXM-80GBRTX-5090-32GB
Runcrate
RunPod
TensorDock○ no answer
Vast.ai○ no answer
Thunder Compute○ no answer
Massed Compute○ no answer
Hyperbolic○ no answer
Hyperstack○ no answer
Modal○ no answer
Lambda○ no answer
Oblivus○ no answer
Verda (DataCrunch)○ no answer
CoreWeave○ no answer
Salad○ no answer
HyperAI○ no answer
Theta EdgeCloud○ no answer
GPUhub○ no answer
Shadeform○ no answer
Nova Cloud○ no answer
Beam○ no answer
Spheron○ no answer

What this page will not tell you

On-demand list rates only · spot and committed terms priced separately and not mixed in here · no performance-per-dollar figure appears on this page, because it needs a throughput benchmark we do not hold and dividing a price by a vendor’s own TFLOPS claim produces a number that looks authoritative and means nothing