Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Security / Governance / Red teaming / superagent

superagent

UNCLAIMEDClaim this listing

By superagent-ai

RED TEAMINGCOMPLIANCE AND GOVERNANCEGUARDRAILS AND FILTERINGPRIVACY AND PII

superagent — Superagent protects your AI applications against prompt injections, data leaks, and harmful outputs. Embed safety directly into your app and prove compliance to your customers. Listed under Red teaming in the Security / Governance layer. 5 of 18 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

Make your software secure itself. Security workers and the Security-One decision model protect applications, repositories, agents, and infrastructure.

4 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD

WebsiteDocsPricing pagesuperagent-ai/superagent

What it runs on, and what runs on it

0 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

No edges on record for superagent.

Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.

Submit a documented integration →

From superagent-ai? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what superagent runs on is enough.

Open-source signals

DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
not measured

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

The seller publishes a pricing page, linked above, but we read no rate from it. Either it quotes by sales call rather than in public, or the last reading passed 21 days and was hidden rather than shown stale. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

5 answered · 13 unanswered

18 questions declared by Red teaming and Compliance and governance and Guardrails and filtering and Privacy and PII. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Checksprompt injections, data leakage, unsafe tool actions, workflow failures
“These systems fail in ways traditional software does not: prompt injections, data leakage, unsafe tool actions, and workflow failures.”
2026-09-22
Data residencykeep all data on your infrastructure
“Data residency : Keep all data on your infrastructure”
2026-09-22
FrameworksLangGraph, Mastra, other frameworks
“Integrate with LangGraph, Mastra, and other frameworks”
2026-09-13
Open sourceYes
“An open-source SDK for AI agent safety”
2026-09-22
PII typesemail, SSN
“const redactResult = await client. redact ({ input: "My email is john@example.com and SSN is 123-45-6789" , model: "openai/gpt-4o-mini" });”
2026-09-22
Air-gapped installno answer on record
Attack libraryno answer on record
Audit logno answer on record
Continuous testingno answer on record
Deploymentno answer on record
Evidence collectionno answer on record
GDPR DPAno answer on record
Languagesno answer on record
Licenceno answer on record
Policy languageno answer on record
Real-time filteringno answer on record
Redactionno answer on record
SOC 2no answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

53 products in Red teaming. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

NVIDIA NeMo GuardrailsUSED BY 1COMPARE →
adrianNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
Adversa AINO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agent-safe-pipelineNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agenthoundNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agentic_securityNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agentosNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
AgentSealNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

Is superagent open source?
Yes — it is listed as open source, and its repository is the source for the activity figures on this page rather than anything the project says about itself.
Does superagent offer open source?
Yes. Read from their own page: “An open-source SDK for AI agent safety”.
What does a blank mean on the superagent page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the superagent figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can superagent change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.
Is this listing run by superagent-ai?
No. It is built from public sources, and no value on it came from the company. Anyone with an address at superagent.sh can claim it for free. A claim lets the company write the tagline, description and logo, and answer blank questions or add dependencies, each marked as theirs with a source. Prices, licence and OSS figures stay as the directory read them, category changes only through our review, and each can be disputed with a source.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “superagent — Red teaming”, read 22 September 2026. Checks: prompt injections, data leakage, unsafe tool actions, workflow failures as published at docs.superagent.sh. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/superagent

What superagent can and cannot change here

Claiming superagent-ai lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.

Claim superagent-aiFree · email at superagent.sh