
By JudgmentLabs
EVALUATION AND BENCHMARKINGTRACING AND MONITORING
judgeval — The Continuous-Improvement Stack for Agents. Our environment data and evals power agent improvement and monitoring. Listed under Evaluation and benchmarking in the Observability / Evals layer. None of the 10 comparison attributes for its category are recorded yet.
The continuous-improvement stack for agents. Monitor and improve your agent's behavior at scale.
4 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD
What it runs on, and what runs on it
5 cited edgesComputed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.
RUNS ON / INTEGRATES WITH
- Anthropicintegrates with sourceJSON
- Google DeepMindintegrates with sourceJSON
- Groqintegrates with sourceJSON
- OpenAIintegrates with sourceJSON
- Together AIintegrates with sourceJSON
USED BY
- nothing recorded
Open-source signals
A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE
Price
We hold no price for this product.
This is open-source software: you can run it yourself and the licence costs nothing. If the project also sells a hosted service, we do not yet hold the page it prices it on. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.
How we read prices →What its categories ask
0 answered · 10 unanswered10 questions declared by Evaluation and benchmarking and Tracing and monitoring. Most rows across the directory read like these.
A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE
Practitioner reviews
Nobody has written one yet.
A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.
NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER
Also in this category
51 products in Evaluation and benchmarking. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.
Frequently asked
Is judgeval open source?
What does judgeval run on?
What does a blank mean on the judgeval page?
Where do the judgeval figures come from?
Can judgeval change what this page says?
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Is this listing run by JudgmentLabs?
Cite this page
A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.
infratoapp, “judgeval — Evaluation and benchmarking”. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/judgeval
What judgeval can and cannot change here
Claiming JudgmentLabs lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.