Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Model / Foundation / Large language models / gpt_academic
G

gpt_academic

UNCLAIMED

By binary-husky

LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS

gpt_academic — 为GPT/GLM等LLM大语言模型提供实用化交互接口，特别优化论文阅读/润色/写作体验，模块化设计，支持自定义快捷按钮&函数插件，支持Python和C++等项目剖析&自译解功能，PDF/LaTex论文翻译&总结功能，支持并行问询多种LLM模型，支持chatglm3等本地模型。接入通义千问, deepseekcoder, 讯飞星火, 文心一言, llama2, rwkv, claude2, moss. Listed under Large language models in the Model / Foundation layer. 2 of 10 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

为GPT/GLM等LLM大语言模型提供实用化交互接口，特别优化论文阅读/润色/写作体验，模块化设计，支持自定义快捷按钮&函数插件，支持Python和C++等项目剖析&自译解功能，PDF/LaTex论文翻译&总结功能，支持并行问询多种LLM模型，支持chatglm3等本地模型。接入通义千问, deepseekcoder, 讯飞星火, 文心一言, llama2, rwkv...

3 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD · MISSING LOGO

Repositorybinary-husky/gpt_academic

What it runs on, and what runs on it

2 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

RUNS ON / INTEGRATES WITH

USED BY

  • nothing recorded

Open-source signals

LICENCE
GPL-3.0
2026-09-21JSON
DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
not measured

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

This is open-source software: you can run it yourself and the licence costs nothing. If the project also sells a hosted service, we do not yet hold the page it prices it on. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

2 answered · 8 unanswered

10 questions declared by Large language models. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Context window300 tokens
“Code Issues 300 ( 300 )”
2026-10-13
Parameters300
“Code Issues 300 ( 300 )”
2026-10-13
Commercial useno answer on record
Fine-tunableno answer on record
Input modalitiesno answer on record
Languagesno answer on record
Open weightsno answer on record
Reasoning modeno answer on record
Structured outputno answer on record
Tool callingno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

40 products in Large language models. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

OpenAIUSED BY 165COMPARE →
Google DeepMindUSED BY 58COMPARE →
AnthropicUSED BY 47COMPARE →
CohereUSED BY 20COMPARE →
AI21 LabsUSED BY 1COMPARE →
01.AINO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agentscopeNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
airunnerNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

Is gpt_academic open source?
Yes — it is listed as open source, and its repository is the source for the activity figures on this page rather than anything the project says about itself.
What does gpt_academic run on?
Anthropic, OpenAI. Every one of those is an edge we recorded from documentation that states it, not an inference from what the two products have in common.
What does a blank mean on the gpt_academic page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the gpt_academic figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can gpt_academic change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.
Is this listing run by binary-husky?
No. It is built from public sources, and no value on it came from the company. Its website is on shared hosting, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. A correction with a source can be sent instead. A claim lets the company write the tagline, description and logo, and answer blank questions or add dependencies, each marked as theirs with a source. Prices, licence and OSS figures stay as the directory read them, category changes only through our review, and each can be disputed with a source.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “gpt_academic — Large language models”, read 13 October 2026. Context window: 300 tokens as published at github.com. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/gpt-academic

What gpt_academic can and cannot change here

Claiming binary-husky lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.

binary-husky’s website is on shared hosting, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. If you maintain it, send a correction with a source.

Maintain binary-husky? Ask us to verify you.