Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Inference / Serving / Gateways and routers / copilot-api
NOINDEX

This page holds no documented attribute, no price and no cited stack edges; anything the vendor added is marked and does not count. So it is excluded from search engines until it holds something. Thin pages get penalised at scale, and a page that says nothing should not be indexed as though it did.

A link to a public page that states what it is, costs or runs on is what fills it. Send one.

C

copilot-api

UNCLAIMED

By caozhiyuan

GATEWAYS AND ROUTERS

copilot-api — GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex, OpenCode Go, and third-party AI provider gateway with OpenAI and Anthropic API compatibility. Listed under Gateways and routers in the Inference / Serving layer. None of the 6 comparison attributes for its category are recorded yet.

GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex, OpenCode Go, and third-party AI provider gateway with OpenAI and Anthropic API compatibility.

3 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD · MISSING LOGO

Websitecaozhiyuan/copilot-api

What it runs on, and what runs on it

0 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

No edges on record for copilot-api.

Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.

Submit a documented integration →

From caozhiyuan? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what copilot-api runs on is enough.

Open-source signals

DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
not measured

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

This is open-source software: you can run it yourself and the licence costs nothing. If the project also sells a hosted service, we do not yet hold the page it prices it on. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

0 answered · 6 unanswered

6 questions declared by Gateways and routers. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Budget limitsno answer on record
Cost attributionno answer on record
Deploymentno answer on record
OpenAI-compatible APIno answer on record
Response cachingno answer on record
Routing policiesno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

78 products in Gateways and routers. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

PortkeyUSED BY 1COMPARE →
10xNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
1flowbaseNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
9routerNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
AdalineNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agent-as-a-routerNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agent-routerNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agentgatewayNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

Is copilot-api open source?
Yes — it is listed as open source, and its repository is the source for the activity figures on this page rather than anything the project says about itself.
What does a blank mean on the copilot-api page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the copilot-api figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can copilot-api change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.
Is this listing run by caozhiyuan?
No. It is built from public sources, and no value on it came from the company. Its website is on shared hosting, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. A correction with a source can be sent instead. A claim lets the company write the tagline, description and logo, and answer blank questions or add dependencies, each marked as theirs with a source. Prices, licence and OSS figures stay as the directory read them, category changes only through our review, and each can be disputed with a source.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “copilot-api — Gateways and routers”. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/copilot-api

What copilot-api can and cannot change here

Claiming caozhiyuan lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.

caozhiyuan’s website is on shared hosting, so an email address cannot prove who owns it and there is no claim by address. If you maintain it, send a correction with a source.

Maintain caozhiyuan? Ask us to verify you.