Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Observability / Evals / Tracing and monitoring / clawmetry

clawmetry

UNCLAIMED

TRACING AND MONITORINGCOST AND USAGE TRACKING

clawmetry — See your agent think. Zero-config observability & governance for 30 AI agent runtimes: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw & 26 more. Live token costs, sessions, tool calls, crons. Listed under Tracing and monitoring in the Observability / Evals layer. 7 of 9 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

Observe AI agent activity, understand spend, and govern supported actions with ClawMetry. Local by default. Start with one install.

4 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD

Websitevivekchand/clawmetry

What it runs on, and what runs on it

0 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

No edges on record for clawmetry.

Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.

Submit a documented integration →

From clawmetry? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what clawmetry runs on is enough.

Open-source signals

DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
2026-09-12
2026-09-12JSON

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

This is open-source software: you can run it yourself and the licence costs nothing. If the project also sells a hosted service, we do not yet hold the page it prices it on. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

7 answered · 2 unanswered

9 questions declared by Tracing and monitoring and Cost and usage tracking. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Budget limitsYes
“Put a limit on routed spend Use budget alerts for visibility. Route compatible model traffic through the optional proxy to enforce limits before another call.”
2026-10-20
Cost attributiontoken, cost attribution, cache analysis, context usage, model routing advice, run comparisons
“Improve the economics Token and cost attribution, cache analysis, context usage, model routing advice and run comparisons. Cost optimization”
2026-10-20
Data residency26 August 2026
“Measured on the machine this page was written on: 102 sessions in 20 hours on 26 August 2026.”
2026-10-20
Framework integrations33 frameworks
“33 runtimes with shipped adapters. Coverage differs per runtime. The picker above says how, for yours.”
2026-10-06
LicenceOpen-source core
“Open-source core”
2026-09-29
Open sourceYes
“Open-source core”
2026-10-27
OpenTelemetryYes
“MCP, OpenTelemetry, custom ingest, alert destinations and Enterprise SIEM export.”
2026-10-13
Alertingno answer on record
Deploymentno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

32 products in Tracing and monitoring. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

langfuseUSED BY 16COMPARE →
LangSmithUSED BY 15COMPARE →
Arize PhoenixUSED BY 4COMPARE →
BraintrustUSED BY 3COMPARE →
RagasUSED BY 2COMPARE →
Weights & Biases WeaveUSED BY 2COMPARE →
opikUSED BY 1COMPARE →
Traceloop OpenLLMetryUSED BY 1COMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

Is clawmetry open source?
Yes — it is listed as open source, and its repository is the source for the activity figures on this page rather than anything the project says about itself.
Does clawmetry offer budget limits?
Yes. Read from their own page: “Put a limit on routed spend Use budget alerts for visibility. Route compatible model traffic through the optional proxy to enforce limits before another call.”.
Does clawmetry offer open source?
Yes. Read from their own page: “Open-source core”.
What does a blank mean on the clawmetry page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the clawmetry figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can clawmetry change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.
Is this listing run by clawmetry?
No. It is built from public sources, and no value on it came from the company. Anyone with an address at the company’s own domain can claim it for free. A claim lets the company write the tagline, description and logo, and answer blank questions or add dependencies, each marked as theirs with a source. Prices, licence and OSS figures stay as the directory read them, category changes only through our review, and each can be disputed with a source.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “clawmetry — Tracing and monitoring”, read 20 October 2026. Budget limits: Yes as published at clawmetry.com. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/clawmetry

What clawmetry can and cannot change here

Claiming the organisation lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.

Claim clawmetryFree · email at the company’s own domain