clawbench
UNCLAIMEDclawbench — Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on daily tasks. Listed under Evaluation and benchmarking in the Observability / Evals layer. 2 of 7 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.
Two-stage scoring: HTTP-request interception + LLM judge. 130 real-world tasks across 63 live platforms. Open submissions via PR.
4 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD
What it runs on, and what runs on it
0 cited edgesComputed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.
No edges on record for clawbench.
Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.
Submit a documented integration →From clawbench? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what clawbench runs on is enough.
Open-source signals
A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE
Price
We hold no price for this product.
This is open-source software: you can run it yourself and the licence costs nothing. If the project also sells a hosted service, we do not yet hold the page it prices it on. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.
How we read prices →What its categories ask
2 answered · 5 unanswered7 questions declared by Evaluation and benchmarking. Most rows across the directory read like these.
A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE
Practitioner reviews
Nobody has written one yet.
A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.
NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER
Also in this category
36 products in Evaluation and benchmarking. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.
Frequently asked
Is clawbench open source?
What does a blank mean on the clawbench page?
Where do the clawbench figures come from?
Can clawbench change what this page says?
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Is this listing run by clawbench?
Cite this page
A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.
infratoapp, “clawbench — Evaluation and benchmarking”, read 29 September 2026. Framework integrations: 8 frameworks as published at claw-bench.com. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/clawbench
What clawbench can and cannot change here
Claiming the organisation lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.