Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Orchestration / Agents / Code execution sandboxes / capev2
C

capev2

UNCLAIMED

CODE EXECUTION SANDBOXES

capev2 — Malware Configuration And Payload Extraction. Listed under Code execution sandboxes in the Orchestration / Agents layer. 2 of 6 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

Malware Configuration And Payload Extraction. Contribute to kevoreilly/CAPEv2 development by creating an account on GitHub.

2 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD · MISSING LOGO, LICENCE

Repositorykevoreilly/CAPEv2

What it runs on, and what runs on it

1 cited edge
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

RUNS ON / INTEGRATES WITH

USED BY

  • nothing recorded

Open-source signals

LICENCE
not measured
DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
not measured

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

Either the pricing is behind a sales call and there is no public page to read, or the last reading passed 21 days and was hidden rather than shown stale. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

2 answered · 4 unanswered

6 questions declared by Code execution sandboxes. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Deploymentboth
“CAPE has been continuously developed and improved to keep pace with advancements in both malware and operating system capabilities.”
2026-10-06
Execution languagesPython
“In 2019 he began the mammoth task of porting CAPE to Python 3 and in October of that year CAPEv2 was released.”
2026-09-29
Cold startno answer on record
Isolationno answer on record
Licenceno answer on record
Open sourceno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

46 products in Code execution sandboxes. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

agent-sandboxNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
agenvoyNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
arcboxNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
arrow-jsNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
astridNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
boxliteNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
claude-agent-serverNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
claude-code-devcontainerNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

What does capev2 run on?
MongoDB Atlas Vector Search. Every one of those is an edge we recorded from documentation that states it, not an inference from what the two products have in common.
What does a blank mean on the capev2 page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the capev2 figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can capev2 change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “capev2 — Code execution sandboxes”, read 6 October 2026. Deployment: both as published at github.com. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/capev2

What capev2 can and cannot change here

Claiming the organisation lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.