By AutoGPT
AGENT FRAMEWORKSWORKFLOW ORCHESTRATION
AutoGPT — AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters. Listed under Agent frameworks in the Orchestration / Agents layer. 4 of 11 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.
Build your team of AI Experts for content, sales, research, and recurring work. Share the context, connect your tools, and let Otto coordinate.
4 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD
What it runs on, and what runs on it
0 cited edgesComputed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.
No edges on record for AutoGPT.
Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.
Submit a documented integration →From AutoGPT? No claim is needed for this: a link to your docs that names what AutoGPT runs on is enough.
Open-source signals
A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE
Price
We hold no price for this product.
The seller publishes a pricing page, linked above, but we read no rate from it. Either it quotes by sales call rather than in public, or the last reading passed 21 days and was hidden rather than shown stale. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.
How we read prices →What its categories ask
4 answered · 7 unanswered11 questions declared by Agent frameworks and Workflow orchestration. Most rows across the directory read like these.
“Human In The Loop GitBook Assistant Pause execution for human review”2026-10-06
“MIT License : The majority of the AutoGPT repository remains under this license.”2026-09-22
A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE
Practitioner reviews
Nobody has written one yet.
A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.
NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER
Also in this category
120 products in Agent frameworks. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.
Frequently asked
Is AutoGPT open source?
Does AutoGPT offer human in the loop?
Does AutoGPT offer open source?
What does a blank mean on the AutoGPT page?
Where do the AutoGPT figures come from?
Can AutoGPT change what this page says?
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Is this listing run by AutoGPT?
Cite this page
A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.
infratoapp, “AutoGPT — Agent frameworks”, read 6 October 2026. Human in the loop: Yes as published at agpt.co. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/autogpt
What AutoGPT can and cannot change here
Claiming AutoGPT lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.