Skip to content
InfratoApp
Layers / Data / RAG / Labelling and annotation / artemis

artemis

UNCLAIMED

LABELLING AND ANNOTATION

artemis — Artemis is a free genome viewer and annotation tool that allows visualization of sequence features and the results of analyses within the context of the sequence, and its six-frame translation. Listed under Labelling and annotation in the Data / RAG layer. 1 of 6 comparison attributes are recorded, each with the page it was read from.

The Artemis Software is a set of software tools for genome browsing and annotation

3 OF 4 SIGNALS HELD · MISSING LICENCE

Websitesanger-pathogens/Artemis

What it runs on, and what runs on it

0 cited edges
The differentiator

Computed from the stack graph, both directions. Every cited edge links the page it was read from; a vendor-added one links the vendor’s own source — this is the reason to be here rather than on the vendor’s own site.

No edges on record for artemis.

Nothing in the directory documents depending on it, and its own docs do not name what it runs on. An edge is only stored when a source states it.

Submit a documented integration →

Open-source signals

LICENCE
not measured
DOWNLOADS 30D
not measured
LAST COMMIT
not measured

A HOLLOW RING IS UNMEASURED, NOT ZERO · WE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE A PARENT COMPANY’S REPOSITORY FOR A PRODUCT THAT HAS NONE

Price

We hold no price for this product.

Either the pricing is behind a sales call and there is no public page to read, or the last reading passed 21 days and was hidden rather than shown stale. If that changes — or if you publish /.well-known/pricing.json — it appears here with a capture date.

How we read prices →

What its categories ask

1 answered · 5 unanswered

6 questions declared by Labelling and annotation. Most rows across the directory read like these.

ATTRIBUTEANSWEREVIDENCE · SOURCE
Annotation typesgenome
“The Artemis Software is a set of software tools for genome browsing and annotation”
2026-09-29
Deploymentno answer on record
Licenceno answer on record
Managed workforceno answer on record
Open sourceno answer on record
Web UIno answer on record

A ROW WITH NO ANSWER IS NOT A ROW WITH A “NO” · A VENDOR MAY ANSWER A BLANK ONE, MARKED VENDOR CLAIMED WITH ITS SOURCE · A DOCUMENTED VALUE IS DISPUTED, NOT OVERWRITTEN, AND STAYS VISIBLE WHILE WE RE-READ THE SOURCE

Practitioner reviews

Nobody has written one yet.

A review here is structured, not a star: hardware, scale band, what broke in production, and whether you would choose it again.

NO PERCENTAGE IS SHOWN UNDER FIVE REVIEWS · NO STAR RATINGS, EVER

Also in this category

38 products in Labelling and annotation. Comparison defaults to within the category — pairing this with a GPU cloud would produce a page that means nothing.

annifNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
annotateNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
annotoriousNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
anylabelingNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
argillaNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
audinoNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
BasicAINO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →
bbox-visualizerNO DEPENDENTS RECORDEDCOMPARE →

USED BY = LISTED PRODUCTS DEPENDING ON IT, IN THIS DIRECTORY

Frequently asked

What does a blank mean on the artemis page?
That nobody has told us, not that the answer is no. A hollow ring is "no answer on record", which is a different state from a recorded no — and the two look different on purpose. A blank is an absence of evidence, and this page shows how many of its questions are in that state rather than quietly leaving them out.
Where do the artemis figures come from?
Each one is read from a public page — usually the vendor's own documentation or pricing page — and carries a link to it with the date it was read. Nothing here is estimated, averaged across sources, or inferred from a similar product. If a figure cannot be traced to a page, it is not published.
Can artemis change what this page says?
They can claim the listing and supply or correct values, which are then labelled as theirs. They cannot remove the page, hide a comparison they are losing, or change a figure somebody else recorded with a source. Nothing on the page is for sale. How the site is paid for is set out under money and independence at /our-data#sec5.
Something here is wrong — how do I fix it?
Dispute the value. Every figure links to the page it was read from, so a dispute names the value and gives a source that contradicts it. That is the only lever anyone has over this page, and it is the same lever for the vendor, a competitor and a reader.

Cite this page

A model that quotes us should quote us correctly. The reading and its date sit inside the citation rather than beside it, because a quotation carrying only a URL goes wrong the week the URL changes.

infratoapp, “artemis — Labelling and annotation”, read 29 September 2026. Annotation types: genome as published at sanger-pathogens.github.io. https://www.infratoapp.com/products/artemis

What artemis can and cannot change here

Claiming the organisation lets its admins and editors change the tagline, description, logo, docs link and deployment model of every product that org owns — live, labelled as theirs, and logged. Answers to blank questions and dependencies go live too, marked as the owner’s and sourced; a documented answer cannot be overwritten. Everything else on this page is a stated fact with a dispute route: price, licence and OSS figures. Those columns are ungranted at the database level, so they are not a feature we withheld — they are a write that cannot happen. Name, category, website, pricing page and package names can be changed by the owner only through our review. A dispute never deletes a value; it marks it and publishes the correction.