Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / ~z-ai/glm-flash-latest vs z-ai/glm-5.3-flashx

~z-ai/glm-flash-latest vs z-ai/glm-5.3-flashx

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, ~z-ai/glm-flash-latest is cheaper: $9.70 a month at OpenRouter, against $136.50 for z-ai/glm-5.3-flashx at OpenRouter — 14.1× the cost.

Cheapest on each

~z-ai/glm-flash-latest
1 SELLERView ~z-ai/glm-flash-latest →
$9.70/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.0285 in, $0.08 out per million
z-ai/glm-5.3-flashx
1 SELLERView z-ai/glm-5.3-flashx →
$136.50/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.37 in, $1.25 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attribute~z-ai/glm-flash-latestz-ai/glm-5.3-flashx
Context window1M1M
AcceptsAa · IMG · VIDAa · IMG · VID
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.0285 / M$0.37 / M
Cached input rate$0.0285 / M$0.09 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.