Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash vs xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro

xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash vs xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash is cheaper: $42.00 a month at Novita AI, against $130.50 for xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro at Novita AI — 3.1× the cost.

Cheapest on each

xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
2 SELLERSView xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash →
$42.00/mo
cheapest, at Novita AI — $0.14 in, $0.28 out per million
xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro
2 SELLERSView xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro →
$130.50/mo
cheapest, at Novita AI — $0.435 in, $0.87 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributexiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flashxiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro
Context window1.1M1.1M
AcceptsAa · IMG · AUD · VIDAa · IMG · AUD · VID
Sellers22
Cheapest input rate$0.14 / M$0.435 / M
Cached input rate$0.0028 / M$0.0036 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.