Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro vs xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash

xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro vs xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash is cheaper: $42.00 a month at Novita AI, against $156.60 for xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro at Novita AI — 3.7× the cost.

Cheapest on each

xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro
2 SELLERSView xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro →
$156.60/mo
cheapest, at Novita AI — $0.522 in, $1.044 out per million
xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
2 SELLERSView xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash →
$42.00/mo
cheapest, at Novita AI — $0.14 in, $0.28 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributexiaomi/mimo-v2.5-proxiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Context window1.1M1.1M
AcceptsAaAa · IMG · AUD · VID
Sellers22
Cheapest input rate$0.48 / M$0.14 / M
Cached input rate$0.0043 / M$0.0028 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.