Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / scaledown/extract vs unbiased/pareto-26.10-preview

scaledown/extract vs unbiased/pareto-26.10-preview

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, scaledown/extract is cheaper: $8.00 a month at OpenRouter, against $320.00 for unbiased/pareto-26.10-preview at OpenRouter — 40.0× the cost.

Cheapest on each

scaledown/extract
1 SELLERView scaledown/extract →
$8.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.04 in, $0 out per million
unbiased/pareto-26.10-preview
1 SELLERView unbiased/pareto-26.10-preview →
$320.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.8 in, $3.2 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributescaledown/extractunbiased/pareto-26.10-preview
Context window1M1M
AcceptsAa · IMG · FILEAa · IMG
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.04 / M$0.8 / M
Cached input rate○ no answer$0.03 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.