Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / scaledown/extract vs ultra-nvfp4

scaledown/extract vs ultra-nvfp4

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, scaledown/extract is cheaper: $8.00 a month at OpenRouter, against $240.00 for ultra-nvfp4 at Fireworks AI — 30.0× the cost.

Cheapest on each

scaledown/extract
1 SELLERView scaledown/extract →
$8.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.04 in, $0 out per million
ultra-nvfp4
1 SELLERView ultra-nvfp4 →
$240.00/mo
cheapest, at Fireworks AI — $0.6 in, $2.4 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributescaledown/extractultra-nvfp4
Context window1M○ no answer
AcceptsAa · IMG · FILE○ no answer
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.04 / M$0.6 / M
Cached input rate○ no answer○ no answer

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Sellerscaledown/extract /moultra-nvfp4 /mo
OpenRouter○ no answer
Fireworks AI○ no answer

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.