Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / router-glm-5.3-flash vs scaledown/extract

router-glm-5.3-flash vs scaledown/extract

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, scaledown/extract is cheaper: $8.00 a month at OpenRouter, against $55.00 for router-glm-5.3-flash at Fireworks AI — 6.9× the cost.

Cheapest on each

router-glm-5.3-flash
1 SELLERView router-glm-5.3-flash →
$55.00/mo
cheapest, at Fireworks AI — $0.15 in, $0.5 out per million
scaledown/extract
1 SELLERView scaledown/extract →
$8.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.04 in, $0 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributerouter-glm-5.3-flashscaledown/extract
Context window○ no answer1M
Accepts○ no answerAa · IMG · FILE
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.15 / M$0.04 / M
Cached input rate○ no answer○ no answer

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.