Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / qwen-3.8-max vs scaledown/extract

qwen-3.8-max vs scaledown/extract

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, scaledown/extract is cheaper: $8.00 a month at OpenRouter, against $700.00 for qwen-3.8-max at Fireworks AI — 87.5× the cost.

Cheapest on each

qwen-3.8-max
1 SELLERView qwen-3.8-max →
$700.00/mo
cheapest, at Fireworks AI — $2 in, $6 out per million
scaledown/extract
1 SELLERView scaledown/extract →
$8.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.04 in, $0 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributeqwen-3.8-maxscaledown/extract
Context window○ no answer1M
Accepts○ no answerAa · IMG · FILE
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$2 / M$0.04 / M
Cached input rate○ no answer○ no answer

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Sellerqwen-3.8-max /moscaledown/extract /mo
Fireworks AI○ no answer
OpenRouter○ no answer

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.