Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / qwen/qwen3.7-flash vs qwen/qwen3.7-plus:batch

qwen/qwen3.7-flash vs qwen/qwen3.7-plus:batch

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, qwen/qwen3.7-flash is cheaper: $12.50 a month at OpenRouter, against $92.00 for qwen/qwen3.7-plus:batch at OpenRouter — 7.4× the cost.

Cheapest on each

qwen/qwen3.7-flash
1 SELLERView qwen/qwen3.7-flash →
$12.50/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.03 in, $0.13 out per million
qwen/qwen3.7-plus:batch
1 SELLERView qwen/qwen3.7-plus:batch →
$92.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.23 in, $0.92 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributeqwen/qwen3.7-flashqwen/qwen3.7-plus:batch
Context window1M262K
AcceptsAa · IMG · VIDAa · IMG
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.03 / M$0.23 / M
Cached input rate$0.006 / M○ no answer

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.