Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct vs qwen/qwen3.7-flash

qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct vs qwen/qwen3.7-flash

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, qwen/qwen3.7-flash is cheaper: $12.50 a month at OpenRouter, against $210.00 for qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct at OpenRouter — 16.8× the cost.

Cheapest on each

qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct
1 SELLERView qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct →
$210.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.8 in, $1 out per million
qwen/qwen3.7-flash
1 SELLERView qwen/qwen3.7-flash →
$12.50/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.03 in, $0.13 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributeqwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instructqwen/qwen3.7-flash
Context window128K1M
AcceptsAa · IMGAa · IMG · VID
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.8 / M$0.03 / M
Cached input rate$0.4 / M$0.006 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.