Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / meta/muse-spark-1.1 vs meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct

meta/muse-spark-1.1 vs meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct is cheaper: $6.50 a month at Novita AI, against $462.50 for meta/muse-spark-1.1 at OpenRouter — 71.2× the cost.

Cheapest on each

meta/muse-spark-1.1
1 SELLERView meta/muse-spark-1.1 →
$462.50/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $1.25 in, $4.25 out per million
meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
2 SELLERSView meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct →
$6.50/mo
cheapest, at Novita AI — $0.02 in, $0.05 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributemeta/muse-spark-1.1meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
Context window1M131K
AcceptsAa · IMG · VID · FILEAa
Sellers12
Cheapest input rate$1.25 / M$0.02 / M
Cached input rate$0.15 / M$0.025 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.