Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro vs ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b

ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro vs ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro is cheaper: $9.00 a month at OpenRouter, against $24.50 for ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b at OpenRouter — 2.7× the cost.

Cheapest on each

ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro
1 SELLERView ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro →
$9.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.017 in, $0.112 out per million
ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b
1 SELLERView ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b →
$24.50/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.06 in, $0.25 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributeibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b
Context window131K131K
AcceptsAaAa
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.017 / M$0.06 / M
Cached input rate○ no answer$0.015 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.