Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 vs z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 vs z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, z-ai/glm-5.3-flash is cheaper: $55.00 a month at Baseten, against $60.00 for deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 at DeepSeek — 1.1× the cost.

Cheapest on each

deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
5 SELLERSView deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 →
$60.00/mo
cheapest, at DeepSeek — $0.15 in, $0.6 out per million
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
5 SELLERSView z-ai/glm-5.3-flash →
$55.00/mo
cheapest, at Baseten — $0.15 in, $0.5 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributedeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Context window1M1M
AcceptsAa · IMGAa · IMG · VID
Sellers55
Cheapest input rate$0.15 / M$0.15 / M
Cached input rate$0.003 / M$0.03 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.