Skip to content
InfratoApp
InfratoApp / Compare / bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-code vs bytedance-seed/ui-tars-1.5-7b

bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-code vs bytedance-seed/ui-tars-1.5-7b

For 100,000 calls of 2,000 in and 500 out, bytedance-seed/ui-tars-1.5-7b is cheaper: $30.00 a month at OpenRouter, against $250.00 for bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-code at OpenRouter — 8.3× the cost.

Cheapest on each

bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-code
1 SELLERView bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-code →
$250.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.5 in, $3 out per million
bytedance-seed/ui-tars-1.5-7b
1 SELLERView bytedance-seed/ui-tars-1.5-7b →
$30.00/mo
cheapest, at OpenRouter — $0.1 in, $0.2 out per million
Aligned facts

Same rows on both sides, including the ones we cannot fill.

Attributebytedance-seed/seed-2.0-codebytedance-seed/ui-tars-1.5-7b
Context window262K128K
AcceptsAa · IMG · VIDAa · IMG
Sellers11
Cheapest input rate$0.5 / M$0.1 / M
Cached input rate○ no answer$0.1 / M

No quality or benchmark row appears here. We hold no throughput or accuracy measurement for either model, and a cost-per-quality figure built from a lab’s own claim would look authoritative and mean nothing.

Cost for this workload — both models, every seller

100,000 calls a month · 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each. Sellers of both models lead, cheapest combined cost first.

Cheapest tier per seller, this workload only. In and output rates, and a cached prefix, are broken out in the cost calculator.