RTX-6000-24GB vs RTX-A4000-16GB
RTX-A4000-16GB is the cheaper of the two: $0.1/hr at TensorDock, against $1.5/hr for RTX-6000-24GB at Akamai Cloud (Linode) — 15.0× the price.
Cheapest on each
Aligned facts
Same sheet, same order, both cards — including the gaps.
| Attribute | RTX-6000-24GB | RTX-A4000-16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24 GB▲ | 16 GB |
| Bandwidth | ○ no answer | ○ no answer |
| FP16 | ○ no answer | ○ no answer |
| FP8 | ○ no answer | ○ no answer |
| TDP | ○ no answer | 140 W |
| NVLink | ○ no answer | ○ no answer |
| Architecture | ○ no answer | ○ no answer |
| Released | ○ no answer | ○ no answer |
A blank is not a zero. Where one card states a figure and the other states none, neither wins the row — the second number is unknown, and ranking an unknown as nothing is how a comparison starts to lie.
Every seller, both cards
One row per seller, cheapest tier, on-demand list prices only. Sellers of both cards lead, cheapest combined rate first.
| Seller | RTX-6000-24GB | RTX-A4000-16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Akamai Cloud (Linode) | $1.502026-10-27 | ○ no answer |
| TensorDock | ○ no answer | $0.102026-10-26 |
| Lium | ○ no answer | $0.122026-10-27JSON |
| Hyperstack | ○ no answer | $0.152026-10-26 |
| RunPod | ○ no answer | $0.252026-10-27 |
| Runcrate | ○ no answer | $1.042026-10-26 |
What this page will not tell you
On-demand list rates only · spot and committed terms priced separately and not mixed in here · no performance-per-dollar figure appears on this page, because it needs a throughput benchmark we do not hold and dividing a price by a vendor’s own TFLOPS claim produces a number that looks authoritative and means nothing